Skip to main content

a topical issue: radicalization

Image
By
The relatively lonely, isolated status of most mass shooters means any community they interact with and any media they consume will have an outsized impact on their psyche. -- http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-reasons-mass-shooters-are-not-kind-crazy-you-think/
This article reminds me of the Bruce Alexander thinking about addiction.  It's interesting because it draws parallels between the people who "self-radicalize" and then act alone, and the people who are coached or goaded into becoming violent either through local connections or via online social media.  Regarding the latter:
... And there's a reason almost every issue of Dabiq includes a fawning story about the actions of some suicide bomber: They want anyone contemplating an attack to know their actions will be remembered and celebrated. You're targeting people with a strong sense of humiliation and no sense of community, and promising them great power and social status -- the two things they've never had. In every circumstance, there was a concerted effort on someone's part to make violence seem cool. - ibid.
This seems to be an extreme case of phatic behavior: promising people acceptance and community within a concrete "afterlife", if not in this life.  There are parallels in the self-radicalized cases discussed in the article.

Naturally, the degree to which people give up their (sense of) self and propriety and so on can change on a case-by-case basis.  Someone who signs up to join the military would not be said to have become "radicalized" -- but he or she does have to give up a lot of aspects of day-to-day life, in exchange for another structure.  The spectrum could continue all the way to normal day-to-day occurrences, where, for example, we might interrupt an in-person conversation to answer an important telephone call.  "Sorry, I've got to take this."

This reminds me of Avital Ronell's conception of telephones in The Telephone Book.

The idea that "mass shooters are not the kind of crazy you think" is interesting, because it suggests that they are still, in a certain sense, "crazy" -- that is, even if just under the influence of a kind of temporary insanity.  Again, this can be relaxed into everyday life -- even into everyday non-human life (wolfs, dolphins, and so forth) -- by which we could give attention to the kind of situations that are particularly "prone" to phatic behavior.  Surveying situations of prone-ness would outline the preconditions of phaticity, and we might find underlying causes of both the overt condition and its preconditions.  A latent tendency to "phase shift" before the phase shift is brought about.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The plot thickens (with Herbert Spencer)

By Semiophrenic
In a paper attempting to outline the conceptual domain of comparative psychology , Herbert Spencer discusses the quality of impulsiveness in relation with human races (bearded and unbearded). Among his "sundry questions of interests" about the relationship between mental energy, evolution, complexity, etc. are the following notes: ( b ) What connection is there between this trait and the social state? Clearly a very explosive nature - such as that of the Bushman - is unfit for social; and, commonly, social union, when by any means established, checks impulsiveness. ( c ) What respective shares in checking impulsiveness are taken by the feelings which the social state fosters - such as the fear of surrounding individuals, the instinct of sociality , the desire to accumulate property, the sympathetic feelings , the sentiment of justice? These, which require a social environment for their development, all of them involve imaginations of consequences more or less distant; and th...
4 comments
Read more

Vitruvius Pollio, The origin of the dwelling house

By
 Chapter 1 of Book II of "Ten Books on Architecture", available from Project Gutenberg .  Sections 1, 2, and 7 (from the Richard Schofield translation published by Penguin rather than the one here) are quoted on pp. 218-219 of Spheres II by Peter Sloterdijk.  Pay particular attention to Section 2. 1. The men of old were born like the wild beasts, in woods, caves, and groves, and lived on savage fare. As time went on, the thickly crowded trees in a certain place, tossed by storms and winds, and rubbing their branches against one another, caught fire, and so the inhabitants of the place were put to flight, being terrified by the furious flame. After it subsided, they drew near, and observing that they were very comfortable standing before the warm fire, they put on logs and, while thus keeping it alive, brought up other people to it, showing them by signs how much comfort they got from it. In that gathering of men, at a time when utterance of sound was purely individual,...
1 comment
Read more