Skip to main content

xenia

Image
By
«Now you and the author are in the same little boat cast away from the safety of finished things, and the way out is through the work itself. It belongs to each equally for that brief time, and as both of you focus on it sitting there in front of you, the "other" as critic -- the judging stranger -- is only in the periphery, comments about the piece are about the piece and not about either of you. This is the magic of the gift.» -- Writers Workshops & the Work of Making Things, p. 35

«Gifts are given without the expectation of direct gifts in return. By making your work a gift, you invite the reader into the circle of something akin to a family, and you can expect the spirit of xenia -- "a bond of solidarity manifesting itself in an exchange of goods and services" -- to take over interactions. A gift has both economic and spiritual content. It is personal. In giving a gift, the giver's goal is to become as empty as possible.»

Cf. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenia_(Greek)

Comments

  1. aridedOctober 3, 2016 at 12:40 PM

    Although xenia concerns gifts for strangers, we saw in the #monthsary paper (and Kula exchange discussions) that it's also practised amongst people who know each other; Barthes gives a theoretical interpretation of communication as exchange. One potentially interesting reference in connection w/ that sort of thing: "The Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village" by Yunxiang Yan.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The plot thickens (with Herbert Spencer)

By Semiophrenic
In a paper attempting to outline the conceptual domain of comparative psychology , Herbert Spencer discusses the quality of impulsiveness in relation with human races (bearded and unbearded). Among his "sundry questions of interests" about the relationship between mental energy, evolution, complexity, etc. are the following notes: ( b ) What connection is there between this trait and the social state? Clearly a very explosive nature - such as that of the Bushman - is unfit for social; and, commonly, social union, when by any means established, checks impulsiveness. ( c ) What respective shares in checking impulsiveness are taken by the feelings which the social state fosters - such as the fear of surrounding individuals, the instinct of sociality , the desire to accumulate property, the sympathetic feelings , the sentiment of justice? These, which require a social environment for their development, all of them involve imaginations of consequences more or less distant; and th...
4 comments
Read more

Extra channels

By Semiophrenic
In the following, I would like to clarify the connection between channel and context and concomitantly the difference between metachannel and parachannel . Paul Kockelman urges us "to notice the fundamental similarity between codes and channels" (2011: 725) but instead of that purported fundamental similarity points out the contrast between them. I argue that context , or objects and states of affairs (Bühler 2011[1934]: 35), demonstrate a closer relationship to channel than to code. This is largely because the first three fundamental relations, sender or subject , context or object , and receiver or addressee , belong to Bühler's original organon model while code , contact and message , which were previously implicit in the organon model, are made explicit as additions to the model by Jakobson (1985[1976c]). Thus the most productive approach would be to pair a component from the original organon model with an additional component in the language functions model....
3 comments
Read more