Skip to main content

Proposal for a Phatic Glossary

A List of Keywords and List of Names would be two wonderful magical devices that could help us navigate into this area. (Joe)
This is a good idea. I've been considering doing something like it for my own blog for a while now because it's getting more and more difficult to navigate through all the clatter and clutter of phatic this and phatic that. My thought was to create a quasi-chronological listing of all sources that say something significant about phatics. I'm sure I'll get around to that when I've exhausted the materials I'm currently working on, but for our current paper I think a list of main terms could actually be useful.

Here's a preliminary list from the top of my head:
  • phatic communion (Malinowski)
  • phatic function (Jakobson)
  • phatic communication (La Barre)
  • phatic image (Virilio)
  • phatic text (Schandorf)
  • phatic negotiation (Coupland, Coupland & Robinson)
  • phatic interpretation (Žegarac & Clark)
  • phatic technology (Vetere et al., Wang et al.)
  • phatic labor (Elyachar)
  • phatic community construction (Blanco)
  • phatic culture (Miller)
This is by no means exhaustive list, but these come to mind first. The question now is: how deep should the list of keywords go, because almost all later authors invent a whose host of phatic sub-terminology, like phatic design, phatic technological habituation, etc. It can get pretty absurd, because phatic exchange and phatic talk are basically synonymous, just like various terms like phatic utterance and phatic statement Not to mention non-canonical terms like phatic act (Austin) and phasis (Wescott), which have been called out by a renowned scholars but whose interpretation of "phatic" almost no-one nowadays subscribes to.

Comments

  1. We should make a similar round-up of the different phatic functions. Rasmus's initial proposal for a set of "multiplied" functions, after Jakobson, is summarized here: http://phatic-workshop.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/phatic-x.html

    I wonder if my use of "conative" has drifted, since I've been using it to describe goal-like interactions, e.g. around a ROADMAP; but in that post it is about acquaintance and reputation. Are roadmaps and reputations linked, or has something here gone screwy? What about my proposed "introductory" and "imperfect" functions: would those fit with the Jakobson functions as special variant versions, or are they "new"?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The plot thickens (with Herbert Spencer)

In a paper attempting to outline the conceptual domain of comparative psychology , Herbert Spencer discusses the quality of impulsiveness in relation with human races (bearded and unbearded). Among his "sundry questions of interests" about the relationship between mental energy, evolution, complexity, etc. are the following notes: ( b ) What connection is there between this trait and the social state? Clearly a very explosive nature - such as that of the Bushman - is unfit for social; and, commonly, social union, when by any means established, checks impulsiveness. ( c ) What respective shares in checking impulsiveness are taken by the feelings which the social state fosters - such as the fear of surrounding individuals, the instinct of sociality , the desire to accumulate property, the sympathetic feelings , the sentiment of justice? These, which require a social environment for their development, all of them involve imaginations of consequences more or less distant; and th...

Vitruvius Pollio, The origin of the dwelling house

 Chapter 1 of Book II of "Ten Books on Architecture", available from Project Gutenberg .  Sections 1, 2, and 7 (from the Richard Schofield translation published by Penguin rather than the one here) are quoted on pp. 218-219 of Spheres II by Peter Sloterdijk.  Pay particular attention to Section 2. 1. The men of old were born like the wild beasts, in woods, caves, and groves, and lived on savage fare. As time went on, the thickly crowded trees in a certain place, tossed by storms and winds, and rubbing their branches against one another, caught fire, and so the inhabitants of the place were put to flight, being terrified by the furious flame. After it subsided, they drew near, and observing that they were very comfortable standing before the warm fire, they put on logs and, while thus keeping it alive, brought up other people to it, showing them by signs how much comfort they got from it. In that gathering of men, at a time when utterance of sound was purely individual,...